Does ketorolac have a “ceiling effect” with no added benefit of higher doses for acute pain?

Comment by InpharmD Researcher

Studies suggest acute pain control with ketorolac in emergency settings is dose-capped at 10 mg, as increasing dosages do not provide additional pain relief but allow the possibility of adverse events.

Background

A 2023 systematic review and meta-analysis published in Annals of Emergency Medicine synthesized data from five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) encompassing 627 adult patients presenting to emergency departments (EDs) with acute pain. The review evaluated the comparative effectiveness and safety of low-dose (10-20 mg) versus high-dose (≥30 mg) parenteral (both intravenous and intramuscular) ketorolac; pain etiologies ranged from renal colic and musculoskeletal pain to abdominal and headache-related discomfort. Results from pooled analyses showed that parenteral ketorolac at doses of 15-20 mg likely produces no clinically meaningful difference in analgesia compared to doses ≥30 mg (mean difference -0.05 mm on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS], 95% CI -4.91 to +5.01; moderate certainty). Similarly, 10 mg dosing showed no significant effect on pain scores versus higher doses (mean difference -1.58 mm, 95% CI -8.86 to +5.71; low certainty). Low-dose ketorolac may be associated with a higher likelihood of requiring rescue analgesia (risk ratio 1.27, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.87; low certainty), although the absolute difference was modest. Importantly, no statistically significant differences were observed in adverse event rates (risk ratio 0.84, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.33; low certainty), and across all included RCTs, no cases of gastrointestinal bleeding or new-onset renal dysfunction were reported, regardless of dose. Findings support the analgesic ceiling effect of ketorolac and reinforce the potential clinical utility of lower doses for robust pain control while minimizing dose-related toxicity. [1]

A 2021 randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial, published as an editorial, evaluated the analgesic ceiling effect of intravenous ketorolac in adult patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with renal colic. Investigators enrolled 165 patients and assigned them evenly into three dosing groups: 10 mg, 20 mg, or 30 mg IV ketorolac. Baseline pain scores were recorded using a 100-point visual analog scale (VAS). At 30 minutes post-administration, all three groups experienced a median VAS pain reduction to 40, irrespective of the dose administered. The 30-mg group reported a decline from 90 to 40, the 20-mg group from 80 to 40, and the 10-mg group from 90 to 40. These findings demonstrated that lower doses of ketorolac were noninferior in pain reduction compared to the standard 30-mg dose, supporting the presence of a clinically relevant analgesic ceiling at or below 10 mg, with lower doses offering comparable efficacy and potentially minimizing adverse drug reactions. Additional evidence from a 2017 randomized controlled trial published in Annals of Emergency Medicine further corroborated this ceiling effect. This study enrolled 240 adults presenting to the ED with moderate pain from renal colic, musculoskeletal etiologies, or acute headaches. Participants were randomized to receive 10 mg, 15 mg, or 30 mg of IV ketorolac, with pain intensity measured on a 0-to-10 numeric rating scale at 30 minutes post-dose. Noninferiority analysis demonstrated that all three dosing groups achieved similar reductions in pain intensity without a statistically significant difference between them. Similarly, a 2021 single-blinded, randomized trial published in the American Journal of Emergency Medicine compared IM ketorolac 15 mg versus 60 mg for acute musculoskeletal pain in 110 military ED patients. Researchers found no significant difference in pain relief between both groups. Collectively, these trials support the recommendation from the American Academy of Emergency Medicine to use the lowest effective ketorolac dose (typically 10 to 15 mg), thereby optimizing safety while maintaining analgesic efficacy. [2]

According to a review on the analgesic efficacy of ketorolac, the most important disadvantage of ketorolac is that there is an analgesic “ceiling.” Doses above 30 mg for parenteral ketorolac and (10 mg PO) provide little additional analgesic benefit. Intravenous ketorolac, as a single agent, also has limited utility in patients with moderate-to-severe pain because a significant percentage of patients fail to obtain adequate relief. This review claims a dose of 0.5 mg/kg appears to be effective in children, but the mention of a dose ceiling in the pediatric population is not discussed. [3]

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is one of the most commonly inherited diseases worldwide that is characterized by chronic hemolytic anemia, and one of the most intractable problems encountered by children with this disease is painful episodes that result from tissue ischemia due to vaso-occlusion. Mild pain is treated using acetaminophen or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), such as ketorolac. Ketorolac generally is not used as a first-line agent due to lack of data regarding the efficacy and adverse effects when used for pain associated with pediatric SCD. Instead, ketorolac can be added to opioids for additional analgesia in situations where opioids provide insufficient analgesia after optimal titration, or more commonly as an adjunct to opioid analgesia in the presence of opioid-related adverse effects. However, ketorolac should not be used for more than 5 days because of the increased risk of toxicity. If ketorolac is to be used, the authors recommend an initial IV loading dose of 1.0 mg/kg, then 0.5 mg/kg q6h to a maximum of 2 mg/kg/day or 10mg PO q4-6h to a maximum of 40 mg/day. [4]

A 2018 Cochrane review and meta-analysis evaluated the use of ketorolac for postoperative pain in children through 13 studies, totaling 920 patients ranging from 356 days to 13.9 years old. The majority of studies chose a dose of either 0.5 mg/kg (as a single or multiple dose regimen) or 1 mg/kg (single dose with 0.5 mg/kg for any subsequent doses), and one study administered ketorolac 1.2 mg/kg q6h. Unfortunately, the authors were unable to assess the total amount of patients with at least a 50% reduction in pain after ketorolac due to insufficient data. There was no clear difference between ketorolac and placebo in the need for rescue medications (relative risk [RR] 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71 to 1.00). Whether ketorolac has an important effect on opioid consumption was also unable to be assessed. The authors conclude the overall was insufficient to support or reject the use of ketorolac in pediatric patients postoperatively due to a lack of data and substantial heterogeneity between available studies. [5]

A 2012 meta-analysis on perioperative ketorolac efficacy stated that a single dose of systemic ketorolac is an effective adjunct in multimodal regimens to reduce postoperative pain. Improved postoperative analgesia achieved with ketorolac was also accompanied by a reduction in postoperative nausea and vomiting. Thirteen randomized clinical trials with 782 subjects who were given ketorolac 30 to 60 mg (either IV or IM) were included. The weighted mean difference (95% confidence interval [CI]) of combined effects showed a difference for ketorolac over placebo for early pain at rest of -0.64 (-1.11 to -0.18) but not at late pain at rest, -0.29 (-0.88 to 0.29) summary point (0-10 scale). The authors state that 60 mg doses may offer better opioid-sparing benefits compared to 30 mg. It should be noted there was significant heterogeneity present in this analysis which may invalidate the authors' conclusions. [6]

References:

[1] Forestell B, Sabbineni M, Sharif S, Chao J, Eltorki M. Comparative Effectiveness of Ketorolac Dosing Strategies for Emergency Department Patients With Acute Pain. Ann Emerg Med. 2023;82(5):615-623. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.04.011
[2] Jaglal R, Nemec EC 2nd. What is the analgesic ceiling dose of ketorolac for treating acute pain in the ED?. JAAPA. 2023;36(5):43-44. doi:10.1097/01.JAA.0000923576.90074.2a
[3] Catapano MS. The analgesic efficacy of ketorolac for acute pain. J Emerg Med. 1996;14(1):67-75. doi:10.1016/0736-4679(95)02052-7
[4] Stinson J, Naser B. Pain management in children with sickle cell disease. Paediatr Drugs. 2003;5(4):229-241. doi:10.2165/00128072-200305040-00003
[5] McNicol ED, Rowe E, Cooper TE. Ketorolac for postoperative pain in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;7(7):CD012294. Published 2018 Jul 7. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD012294.pub2
[6] De Oliveira GS Jr, Agarwal D, Benzon HT. Perioperative single dose ketorolac to prevent postoperative pain: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Anesth Analg. 2012;114(2):424-433. doi:10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182334d68

Literature Review

A search of the published medical literature revealed 3 studies investigating the researchable question:

Does ketorolac have a “ceiling effect” with no added benefit of higher doses for acute pain?

Level of evidence

B - One high-quality study or multiple studies with limitations  Read more→



Please see Tables 1-3 for your response.


 

Comparison of Intravenous Ketorolac at Three Single-Dose Regimens for Treating Acute Pain in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Design

Randomized, double-blind, single-center, controlled trial

N=240

Objective

To compare the analgesic efficacy of three doses of intravenous ketorolac on acute pain

Study Groups

Ketorolac 10 mg (n=80)

Ketorolac 15 mg (n=80)

Ketorolac 30 mg (n=80)

Inclusion Criteria

Adults aged 18 to 65 years old, presented with acute pain in the emergency department with a score of >5 on a standard 0 to 10 pain scale

Exclusion Criteria

Older than 65 years, pregnancy or breastfeeding, active peptic ulcer disease, acute gastrointestinal hemorrhage, known history of renal or hepatic insufficiency

Methods

Participants were randomized to receive either 10, 15, or 30 mg of ketorolac in 10 mL of normal saline. Each dose of ketorolac was administered by intravenous push during 1 to 2 minutes.  Pain scale was not specifically defined but described as the numeric rating scale pain score. The scale was assumed to be 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable) based on the data presented.  

Duration

Up to 120 minutes

Outcome Measures

Reduction in pain over the course of 120 mins

Baseline Characteristics

 

Ketorolac 10 mg (n=80)

Ketorolac 15 mg (n=80)

Ketorolac 30 mg (n=80)

Age, years

41.5 40.1 38.8

Male

39 (48.8%) 32 (40%) 37 (46.3%)

Baseline pain score

7.73 7.54 7.80

Results

 

Ketorolac 10 mg (n=80)

Ketorolac 15 mg (n=80)

Ketorolac 30 mg (n=80)

Pain score

After 15 mins

After 30 mins

After 60 mins

After 90 mins

After 120 mins

 

6.12

5.13

4.56

4.03

3.77

 

5.73

5.05

4.09

3.92

3.60

 

5.94

4.84

4.11

3.66

3.44

Adverse Events

Common Adverse Events (10 mg; 15 mg; 30 mg): dizziness (17.5%; 20%; 15%); nausea (11.3%; 13.8%; 10%); headache (10%; 2.5%; 3.8%); itching (0%; 1.3%; 1.4%); flushing (0%; 1.3%; 0%)

Study Author Conclusions

Ketorolac has similar analgesic efficacy profiles at intravenous doses of 10, 15, and 30 mg for short-term treatment of acute moderate to severe pain in the ED.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

Although this study was powered for superiority, it measured noninferiority. This is an important distinction to make because failure to find evidence of a difference is not the same as evidence of a lack of difference. Other limitations of this study include the single-center design, which may be susceptible to selection bias.



References:

Motov S, Yasavolian M, Likourezos A, et al. Comparison of Intravenous Ketorolac at Three Single-Dose Regimens for Treating Acute Pain in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2017;70(2):177-184.

 

Comparison of Intravenous Ketorolac at Three Doses for Treating Renal Colic in the Emergency Department: A Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial

Design

Prospective, noninferiority, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial

N = 165

Objective

To compare the analgesic effects of three different doses of intravenous ketorolac in patients with renal colic 

Study Groups

Ketorolac 10 mg (n = 55)

Ketorolac 20 mg (n = 55)

Ketorolac 30 mg (n = 55)

Inclusion Criteria

Adult patients presenting in the emergency department with acute severe flank pain or abdominal pain that were attributed to renal colic by the emergency physician

Exclusion Criteria

Age > 65 years, acute gastrointestinal hemorrhage, active peptic ulcer disease, renal insufficiency, liver insufficiency, pregnancy, breastfeeding, and previous administration of analgesic in the past 24 hours

Methods

Patients were assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive either ketorolac 10 mg, 20 mg, or 30 mg. Before administration of ketorolac, the patient's respiratory rate, heart rate, blood pressure, and oxygen saturation were obtained and documented. The patient's baseline pain was assessed was also assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS).

The only other analgesic the patients in the study received in the study was 0.1 mg/kg of intravenous morphine. This was given if pain persisted 30 minutes after the administration of ketorolac. At baseline and after 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes of the administration of ketorolac, the patient's vital signs, VAS scores, and adverse events were assessed.

Duration

November 5th, 2018 to November 9th, 2019

Outcome Measures

Primary outcome: The alleviation of pain seen through the VAS after 30 minutes of ketorolac administration

Secondary outcomes: The alleviation of pain at 15, 45, and 60 minutes after ketorolac administration

Baseline Characteristics

  Ketorolac 10 mg (n = 55)

Ketorolac 20 mg (n = 55)

Ketorolac 30 mg (n = 55)  

Age, years

40.38 ± 10.82 39.18 ± 9.17 41.64 ± 9.82  

Male

74.5% 80% 69.1%  

Median VAS score, mm (95% CI)

90 (85-92) 80 (73-90) 90 (80-90)  

Duration of pain at presentation, hours

4.04 ± 2.24 3.75 ± 1.70 3.60 ± 1.40  

Results

 

Ketorolac 10 mg (n = 55)

Ketorolac 20 mg (n = 55)

Ketorolac 30 mg (n = 55)

P-value

Median VAS pain scores (95% CI)

At 15 minutes

At 30 minutes*

At 45 minutes

At 60 minutes

 

61 (58 to 70)

40 (35 to 50)

15 (10 to 20)

5 (0 to 10)

 

60 (50 to 68)

40 (40 to 49)

20 (13 to 25)

5 (0 to 10)

 

60 (60 to70)

40 (34 to 50)

13 (10 to 18)

5 (0 to 10)

 

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS=not significant

*Primary outcome (for which the study was powered)

Adverse Events

Common Adverse Events: Headaches, nausea, and vomiting

Study Author Conclusions

In this study, ketorolac showed a similar analgesic profile in doses of 10, 20, and 30 mg in pain management of renal colic. These results were consistent with the previous studies that proposed a lower dose of 10 mg would be sufficient for pain control.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

Some of the patients did not undergo computed tomography scan to confirm urolithiasis as the cause of pain. The study was limited to pain relief properties of this medication in the emergency department and did not evaluate the treatment effects beyond 1 hour. This was also conducted at three centers in Iran, which may limit generalizability.



References:

Eidinejad L, Bahreini M, Ahmadi A, Yazdchi M, Thiruganasambandamoorthy V, Mirfazaelian H. Comparison of intravenous ketorolac at three doses for treating renal colic in the emergency department: A noninferiority randomized controlled trial [published online ahead of print, 2020 Dec 28]. Acad Emerg Med. 2020;10.1111/acem.14202. doi:10.1111/acem.14202

 

Intraoperative ketorolac dose of 15mg versus the standard 30mg on early postoperative pain after spine surgery

Design

Prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial

N=50

Objective

To show the non-inferiority of 15 mg intraoperative dose of ketorolac as compared to the standard 30 mg ketorolac by looking at the visual analog scale pain (VAS) scores 4 hours after an adult spine surgery

Study Groups

Ketorolac 15 mg (n=25)

Ketorolac 30 mg (n=25)

Methods

Inclusion criteria: 18–65 years of age undergoing lumbar decompression spine surgery

Exclusion criteria: Previous lumbar laminectomy, current anticoagulant use with INR > 1.2, narcotic use >4 weeks, known allergy or sensitivity to NSAID or morphine, renal insufficiency with creatinine > 100 μmol/L, known liver disease, history of gastrointestinal bleeding, pregnancy, history of bronchial asthma and NSAID use 2 days before surgery

Patients were randomized into two groups by a computer-generated random sequence number. Group A received a single intraoperative dose of 15 mg ketorolac at the end of surgery and group B received a single intraoperative dose of 30 mg ketorolac.

Duration

Up to 24 hours

Outcome Measures

Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores 4 h after surgery

Baseline Characteristics

 

Ketorolac 15 mg (n=25)

Ketorolac 30 mg (n=25)

p-value

Age, years

53 54 0.420

Male

17(68%) 17(68%) 1.0

Weight

87.0 ± 15.0 85.8 ± 15.4 0.787

Results

 

Ketorolac 15 mg (n=25)

Ketorolac 30 mg (n=25)

p-value

VAS Pain Score 4 h post-op, mm

Intent to treat

Per protocol

 

33.4 ± 23.1

33.3 ± 21.7

 

25.5 ± 20.7

26.3 ± 21.8

 

0.207

0.307

Adverse Events

Common Adverse Events: (15mg; 30mg) Nausea at 8 hours (2, 9%; 5, 20%) Nausea at 24 hours (1, 4.5%; 6, 24%) Vomiting at 8 hours (1, 4.5%; 3, 12%) Pruritus at 8 hours (1, 4.5%; 1, 4.5%) Pruritus at 24 hours (0, 0%; 3, 12.5%)

Study Author Conclusions

Ketorolac 30 mg intravenous was not superior to 15 mg intravenous for post-operative pain management after spine surgery. However, 15 mg failed to meet the pre-specified criteria for non-inferiority to the 30 mg dose.

InpharmD Researcher Critique

Limitations of the trial include small sample size, but it does add further information about ketorolac dosing. Although there was no statistically significant difference, the 30 mg dose did show greater pain reduction.



References:

Duttchen KM, Lo A, Walker A, et al. Intraoperative ketorolac dose of 15mg versus the standard 30mg on early postoperative pain after spine surgery: A randomized, blinded, non-inferiority trial. J Clin Anesth. 2017;41:11-15.