A 2026 network meta-analysis evaluated calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)–based regimens in lupus nephritis, including 16 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 1,994 patients through March 1, 2025 (voclosporin [VOC] in 2 trials, tacrolimus [TAC] in 9, cyclosporine A [CsA] in 5). Every included trial compared a CNI-based regimen against a non-CNI comparator (steroid alone or with cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil [MMF], or azathioprine); no trial randomized patients between two different CNIs, and both VOC trials compared VOC + MMF + prednisone against MMF + prednisone. All VOC-versus-TAC and VOC-versus-CsA estimates were therefore indirect. VOC + MMF + steroid ranked highest for complete and total remission, followed by TAC + MMF + steroid, but the differences between these two regimens were not statistically significant for either outcome. Infection was the only safety outcome showing significant between-regimen differences, with VOC-based therapy ranking least favorably. The authors identified reliance on indirect evidence, treatment of "CNI" as a single class node, and predominance of Asian populations as key limitations, and recommended that future analyses model VOC, TAC, and CsA separately once head-to-head data become available. Belimumab was not among the interventions evaluated. [1]
A 2025 network meta-analysis evaluated 40 RCTs involving 5,450 patients and 17 initial treatment regimens for active lupus nephritis, using mycophenolic acid analogues (MPAA) as the common comparator. Compared with MPAA alone, complete renal response was increased with voclosporin + MPAA (risk ratio [RR] 1.90; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.47–2.47; high-certainty evidence), belimumab + MPAA (RR 1.47; 95% CI 1.23–1.74; high-certainty evidence), and tacrolimus + MPAA (RR 1.54; 95% CI 1.14–2.07; low-certainty evidence), while evidence for cyclosporine was very low certainty, with an uncertain effect on complete renal response. Overall renal response was also increased with voclosporin + MPAA (RR 1.35), belimumab + MPAA (RR 1.29), and tacrolimus + MPAA (RR 1.24). Tacrolimus + MPAA was associated with increased infections versus MPAA (RR 1.71; low-certainty evidence), while voclosporin + MPAA was associated with a smaller increase in infections (RR 1.14; moderate-certainty evidence) and a trivial effect on severe infections; belimumab + MPAA had a trivial to no effect on severe or serious adverse events. Most comparisons among voclosporin, tacrolimus, cyclosporine, belimumab, and other active treatments relied on indirect evidence rather than head-to-head trials. [2]
A 2024 network meta-analysis evaluated 10 RCTs involving 1,989 adults with lupus nephritis and compared biologic therapies, multitarget therapy consisting of tacrolimus + MMF + glucocorticoids, and standard therapy for induction treatment. Compared with standard therapy, complete renal remission was higher with multitarget therapy (odds ratio [OR] 2.78; 95% CI 1.81–4.26), voclosporin 23.7 mg (OR 2.61; 95% CI 1.79–3.79), voclosporin 39.5 mg (OR 1.90; 95% CI 1.07–3.37), and belimumab (OR 1.75; 95% CI 1.13–2.70); multitarget therapy ranked highest for complete renal remission, followed by voclosporin 23.7 mg, while belimumab ranked lower. Total renal remission was also higher than standard therapy with multitarget therapy (OR 3.20; 95% CI 1.98–5.19), voclosporin (OR 2.16; 95% CI 1.40–3.34), and belimumab (OR 1.56; 95% CI 1.07–2.27). No statistically significant differences among treatment regimens were observed for serious adverse events or serious infections. Comparisons between voclosporin, tacrolimus-based multitarget therapy, and belimumab were primarily indirect, and the authors stated that direct head-to-head trials were lacking. [3]
A 2025 network meta-analysis compared belimumab (BEL), rituximab (RTX), and voclosporin (VOC) in lupus nephritis, searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Register, and ClinicalTrials.gov through October 2024. Five registered RCTs enrolling 1,212 subjects were included (Rovin 2012, Rovin 2019, Furie 2020, Rovin 2021/AURORA 1, Saxena 2024/AURORA 2), yielding six network nodes: VOC 23.7 mg at 1 year, VOC 39.5 mg at 1 year, VOC 23.7 mg at 2 years, BEL at 2 years, RTX at 1 year, and placebo. Per the inclusion criteria and Table 1, each trial compared its active agent against placebo added to background therapy; the only direct active-versus-active edge in the network was between the two VOC doses within the three-arm dose-ranging trial. For complete renal remission, SUCRA rankings were VOC-1Y (93.3%) > high-dose VOC-1Y (64.7%) > VOC-2Y (60.8%) > BEL-2Y (58.5%) > placebo (14.9%) > RTX-1Y (7.8%); all interventions except RTX were significantly superior to placebo, and VOC-1Y was significantly superior to RTX-1Y (OR 3.20; 95% CI 1.41–7.24). The VOC-versus-BEL comparison was not statistically significant (OR 1.49, 95% CI 0.84–2.65). For safety, placebo was superior to high-dose VOC for adverse events (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.07–0.82); no significant differences were found for serious adverse events. The authors noted that with only five trials the effect estimates were imprecise, the SUCRA rankings unstable, and the conclusions preliminary. No calcineurin inhibitor other than VOC was evaluated. [4]
A 2021 network meta-analysis assessed four RCTs involving 936 patients and compared voclosporin + MMF, tacrolimus + MMF, and MMF or cyclophosphamide monotherapy as induction treatment for lupus nephritis. Tacrolimus + MMF was associated with a higher complete remission rate than monotherapy (OR 2.85; 95% credible interval [CrI] 1.87–4.39), while voclosporin + MMF was also associated with higher complete remission than monotherapy (OR 1.99; 95% CrI 1.35–2.97). Tacrolimus + MMF appeared to be more efficacious than voclosporin + MMF (OR 1.43; 95% CrI 0.80–2.57) and ranked highest for efficacy (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] 0.942), followed by voclosporin + MMF (SUCRA 0.558). For safety, monotherapy ranked highest, followed by voclosporin + MMF and tacrolimus + MMF, with no statistically significant differences in serious adverse events between monotherapy and either combination. The authors concluded that both CNI-based combination regimens were more effective than monotherapy, although additional head-to-head studies are needed to better establish their relative efficacy and safety. [5]
A 2026 Bayesian network meta-analysis of 12 RCTs indirectly compared triple immunosuppressive regimens for active and severe lupus nephritis, including 2,797 patients in the efficacy analysis and 2,963 patients in the safety analysis; no head-to-head trials directly comparing these regimens were identified. Standard of care (SOC) plus voclosporin did not significantly differ from SOC plus tacrolimus (benefit ratio [BR] 1.13; 95% credible interval [CrI] 0.77–1.66) or SOC plus belimumab (BR 1.28; 95% CrI 0.90–1.85) for primary renal remission, although voclosporin ranked second behind tacrolimus according to SUCRA probabilities (82.27% vs 95.12%). Serious adverse events and serious infectious events did not significantly differ among the evaluated immunosuppressive therapies. These findings represent indirect comparisons based on aggregate trial-level data rather than direct head-to-head evidence; observational studies, including case series and case reports, were excluded. [6]