What are the alternatives to meperidine for treating post-operative shivering and rigors (especially after amphotericin B)?

Comment by InpharmD Researcher

In general, dexmedetomidine, clonidine, and doxapram, among other agents, have been observed to reduce postoperative shivering. Additional studies have identified fentanyl and tramadol to reduce postoperative shivering. For rigors, dantrolene was found to be effective in 2 of 3 refractory patients with amphotericin B-induced rigors, while morphine was effective in preventing rigors caused by other medications; it is unknown if morphine is effective for treating rigors associated with amphotericin B. Overall, there is a lack of data to support specific alternatives for rigors associated with amphotericin B.

Background

A 2015 meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of prophylactic nefopam administration for the prevention of perioperative shivering by aggregating data from nine randomized controlled trials encompassing 925 adult surgical participants. The included trials enrolled patients undergoing general, neuraxial, or conscious sedation anesthesia, with nefopam administered intravenously at various time points, either preoperatively or at the end of surgery. Only one study (Rosa et al.) was referenced which evaluated the use of nefopam in populations who experienced perioperative shivering related to amphotericin use. This meta-analysis demonstrated a robust and statistically significant reduction in the risk of perioperative shivering with nefopam compared to placebo, with a pooled relative risk (RR) of 0.08 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05 to 0.13) and no significant heterogeneity across trials (I² = 0%). Subgroup findings revealed consistent efficacy in both general anesthesia (RR 0.10 95% CI 0.06 to 0.16) and neuraxial anesthesia settings (RR 0.05 95% CI 0.01 to 0.18). A further analysis of three trials directly comparing nefopam to clonidine (n = 407) indicated that nefopam was more effective in reducing shivering (RR 0.34 95% CI 0.17 to 0.70). Additionally, pooled extubation time data from four trials showed no significant difference between nefopam and placebo groups (weighted mean difference [WMD] 0.92 minutes; 95% CI −0.15 to 1.99), underscoring the agent’s neutrality in recovery duration. Across the included trials, nefopam did not demonstrate an increased risk of major adverse effects, highlighting its favorable safety profile relative to alpha-2 agonists or opioids commonly used for shivering prophylaxis. However, the generalizability of findings to patient populations experiencing shivering and rigors due to amphotericin is limited due to the lack of adequate representation. [1]

In a dated randomized trial, a total of 45 patients with cancer and systemic fungal infections received either nefopam IV 0.3 mg/kg, meperidine IV 0.7 mg/kg, or saline for a total of 15 minutes prior to amphotericin B infusion cessation, in an effort to reduce post-operative shivering. If saline patients were still shivering following administration, nefopam IV 0.3 mg/kg or meperidine IV 0.7 mg/kg were administered. Shivering was significantly less pronounced in nefopam patients (6.6%) and meperidine patients (40%) compared to saline, with nefopam terminating shivering more quickly compared to meperidine (29.1 ± 4.8 vs 200.0 ± 30.2 seconds). Adverse reactions observed from nefopam use was primarily nausea, while meperidine use observed more sedation; both adverse reactions were minute. Though nefopam appears to be more efficacious than meperidine in prevention of post-operative shivering associated with amphotericin, the agent is not currently available on the US market. [2]

A 2022 systematic review and meta-analysis sought to evaluate efficacy of pharmacological agents administered intra-operatively to manage shivering in patients undergoing elective surgery under regional anesthesia. A total of 10 randomized trials were included, which utilized tramadol, dexmedetomidine, clonidine, meperidine, nalbuphine, magnesium sulfate, nefopam, and butorphanol; tramadol and dexmedetomidine were the most commonly utilized medications. Control of shivering was reported in seven trials, though reporting method was heterogeneous (e.g., success rate, response rate). The most effective drug appears to be IV dexemedetomidine 0.5 mcg/kg when given immediately after appearance of shivering. Clonidine has been used similarly, with some adverse events. Tramadol, pethidine, and butorphanol were considered effective opioid interventions in the management of shivering. Comparisons of the agents to meperidine were not provided, however, evidence is not specific to cases of amphotericin-induced shivering and data in general are limited. [3]

A 2004 systematic review assessed the relative efficacy of pharmacological interventions in preventing postoperative shivering. Although not related to intraoperative amphotericin-use, the review included randomized comparisons of prophylactic, parenteral, single-dose antishivering interventions against inactive controls (placebo or no treatment). A total of 27 trials (N= 1248) were analyzed, and the average incidence of shivering in the control group was 52%. Clonidine (65-300 mcg), meperidine (12.5-35 mg), tramadol (35-220 mg), and nefopam (6.5-11 mg) were tested in at least three trials each. All were found to be more effective than control. Clonidine, meperidine, and nefopam showed weak evidence of dose responsiveness. For small-dose clonidine (65-110 mcg), the relative risk (RR) was 1.32 (95% CI 1.16 to 1.51), while medium-dose clonidine (140-150 mcg) had an RR of 1.83 (95% CI 1.47 to 2.27), and large-dose clonidine (220-300 mcg) had an RR of 1.52 (95% CI 1.30 to 1.78). The overall RR for clonidine was 1.58 (95% CI 1.43 to 1.74), with a number needed to treat (NNT) of 3.7. For all meperidine regimens combined, the RR was 1.67 (95% CI 1.37 to 2.03), with an NNT of 3. Tramadol had an RR of 1.93 (95% CI 1.56 to 2.39), with an NNT of 2.2, while nefopam had an RR of 2.62 (95% CI 2.02 to 3.40), with an NNT of 1.7. Other interventions, such as methylphenidate, midazolam, dolasetron, ondansetron, physostigmine, urapidil, and flumazenil, were tested in fewer trials with limited patient numbers. Overall, the authors found that using simple pharmacological treatments to prevent postoperative shivering is effective, especially in patients with a high risk of developing this complication. [4]

A 2002 systematic review and quantitative meta-analysis investigated the pharmacological treatment of postoperative shivering. The review analyzed 20 randomized controlled trials published between 1984 and 2000, involving a total of 944 adult patients receiving an active drug treatment and 413 controls. Shivering is a common complication following surgery that can increase oxygen consumption and cardiovascular strain. Various drugs are used off-label to treat postoperative shivering; however, their relative efficacy is unclear. The meta-analysis found that meperidine 25 mg, clonidine 150 mcg, ketanserin 10 mg, and doxapram 100 mg showed efficacy in reducing shivering in at least three randomized trials each after five minutes. Meperidine 25 mg had the lowest NNT of 1.3 after five minutes, suggesting it had a shorter onset than the other drugs tested. However, clonidine 150 mcg and doxapram 100 mg also had NNT <2 at five minutes, indicating they could reduce shivering in two out of three patients within five minutes compared to placebo. Ketanserin efficacy declined over time and was not significantly better than placebo after 30 minutes. Long-term efficacy data and information on adverse effects were generally lacking for most drugs. In conclusion, the limited data suggests clonidine and doxapram were found to be effective short-term treatments for postoperative shivering along with meperidine. However, there is insufficient data on patients that may experience amphotericin-related rigors or shivering. [5]

A recent meta-analysis assessed the prophylactic use of IV acetaminophen for preventing postoperative shivering. A total of nine trials involving 856 patients were included in the analysis. The findings indicated that acetaminophen significantly reduced the incidence of postoperative shivering compared to placebo (RR 0.43; 95% CI 0.35 to 0.52). Additionally, subgroup analysis revealed that both a single-dose bolus of IV acetaminophen 1000 mg (RR 0.22; 95% CI 0.10 to 0.45) and IV acetaminophen 15 mg/kg (RR 0.43; 95% CI 0.33 to 0.62) were effective in reducing the incidence of postoperative shivering. Based on these findings, it was suggested that prophylactic infusion of IV acetaminophen may potentially offer advantages in reducing perioperative shivering. [6]

A 2023 meta-analysis evaluated the perioperative administration of dexamethasone to prevent postoperative shivering. The review included 12 randomized controlled trials (N= 1276 patients), all of which assessed the overall incidence of postoperative shivering. The trials included a variety of surgeries, such as orthopedic, urological, and general procedures, performed under both general and spinal anesthesia. The results indicated that patients in the dexamethasone group experienced a significantly lower incidence of postoperative shivering (RR 0.39; 95% CI 0.23 to 0.63; p<0.00001) compared to the control group. Additionally, dexamethasone reduced the grade of shivering, which was classified into five grades (0-4) based on clinical manifestations. Specifically, the reduction was significant for grade 2 (RR 0.48; 95% CI 0.33 to 0.69; p<0.0001), grade 3 (RR 0.14; 95% CI 0.06 to 0.37; p<0.0001), and grade 4 (RR 0.13; 95% CI 0.04 to 0.38; p= 0.0002); however, it was not significant for grade 1 (RR 0.94; 95% CI 0.60 to 1.48). Overall, the authors concluded that the administration of dexamethasone is associated with a lower incidence of postoperative shivering; however, further studies are warranted. [7]

A 2016 abstract describes a randomized, double-blind clinical trial that involved 160 healthy patients (ASA I-II) undergoing surgeries lasting over an hour under general anesthesia. They were divided into four groups: Group A received dexmedetomidine (1 µg/kg), Group B received meperidine (0.4 mg/kg), Group C received ketamine (0.5 mg/kg), and Group D (placebo) received saline. The drugs were given intravenously 20 minutes before skin closure, with standardized anesthesia and postoperative monitoring to ensure consistency. Results showed the highest shivering incidence in the placebo group (47%), particularly for severe shivering (levels 3 and 4: 22% and 18%). Notably, the meperidine group had no cases of severe shivering, and the placebo group required the most additional shivering treatment (38%). The study concluded that a single 0.4 mg/kg dose of intravenous meperidine is highly effective in preventing postoperative shivering. [8]

A 1986 case series described the prophylactic and therapeutic use of intravenous dantrolene sodium in managing amphotericin B–induced rigors in three patients undergoing antifungal therapy for serious systemic infections. Each patient had experienced violent chills and febrile responses during amphotericin B infusions, which were refractory to standard prophylactic interventions such as acetaminophen, antihistamines, corticosteroids, and opioids, including meperidine. Rigors typically developed within 30 to 90 minutes of starting the infusion, despite adequate premedication with conventional agents. Following the administration of dantrolene sodium—either as a prophylactic dose of 50 mg IV given prior to amphotericin B or as an interventional dose ranging from 10 to 20 mg IV upon onset of rigors—all three patients exhibited prompt resolution or significant improvement of symptoms. One patient who received dantrolene preemptively in subsequent doses of amphotericin B remained free of rigors for the remainder of therapy. In another case, rigors subsided within ten minutes of IV dantrolene administration following onset, allowing continuation of antifungal therapy. A third patient experienced partial relief after an initial 20 mg IV dose and complete resolution after an additional 10 mg IV dose; however, due to underlying hyperbilirubinemia, further dantrolene use was avoided, and meperidine was resumed. Notably, no adverse effects attributable to dantrolene were reported in any of the patients treated. The pharmacologic rationale was supported by dantrolene’s mechanism of action as a skeletal muscle relaxant that inhibits calcium release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum, thereby disrupting muscle excitation. These findings suggest that dantrolene may serve as a viable adjunct or alternative to conventional agents in the management of amphotericin B–induced rigors, particularly in cases unresponsive to opioid treatment. [9]

References:

[1] Lv M, Wang X, Qu W, Liu M, Wang Y. Nefopam for the prevention of perioperative shivering: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Anesthesiol. 2015;15:87. Published 2015 Jun 9. doi:10.1186/s12871-015-0068-y
[2] Rosa G. Efficacy of nefopam for the prevention and treatment of amphotericin B—Induced shivering. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1997;157(14):1589. doi:10.1001/archinte.1997.00440350097010
[3] Hameed M, Akber Ali N, Ahsan K, Nazir M. Pharmacological Interventions for the Treatment and Control of Shivering in Adult Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery Under Regional Anaesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2022;50(4):246-254. doi:10.5152/TJAR.2021.20008
[4] Kranke P, Eberhart L, Roewer N, Tramèr MR. Single-Dose Parenteral Pharmacological Interventions for the Prevention of Postoperative Shivering: A Quantitative Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Anesth Analg. 2004;99(3):718-727. doi:10.1213/01.ANE.0000130589.00098.CD
[5] Kranke P, Eberhart LH, Roewer N, Tramèr MR. Pharmacological treatment of postoperative shivering: a quantitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Anesth Analg. 2002;94(2):. doi:10.1097/00000539-200202000-00043
[6] Liu J, Cao Q, Zeng J, Liang X. Efficacy of intravenous acetaminophen on postoperative shivering: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024;103(28):e38710. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000038710
[7] Tu Q, Zhou R, Wan Z, Chen S, Yang Q, Que B. Perioperative administration of dexamethasone to prevent postoperative shivering: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Int Med Res. 2023;51(8):3000605231187805. doi:10.1177/03000605231187805
[8] Alvarez Corredor FA. Comparison of the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine, meperidine and ketamine in the prevention of postoperative shivering. Comparación de la eficacia de dexmedetomidina, meperidina y ketamina en la prevención de escalofrío postoperatorio. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2016;63(9):505-512. doi:10.1016/j.redar.2016.02.006
[9] Gross MH, Fulkerson WJ, Moore JO. Prevention of amphotericin B-induced rigors by dantrolene [published correction appears in Arch Intern Med 1986 Dec;146(12):2328]. Arch Intern Med. 1986;146(8):1587-1588.

Literature Review

A search of the published medical literature revealed 3 studies investigating the researchable question:

What are the safest and most effective alternatives to meperidine for treating post-operative shivering and rigors with amphotericin?

Level of evidence

C - Multiple studies with limitations or conflicting results  Read more→



Please see Tables 1-3 for your response.


Treatment With Morphine to Stop Rigors Associated With Rituximab and Antithymocyte Globulin

Design

Pharmacist-led, observational, single-center, retrospective chart review

N= 57

Objective To assess if the use of intravenous (IV) morphine stopped rigors associated with treatment with rituximab and ATG. The secondary objectives included determining the dose required to treat rigors and the time to resolution of rigors
Study Groups

Rituximab (n= 34)

ATG (n= 23)

Inclusion Criteria

Patients aged ≥18 years, received rituximab or ATG for a hematology or oncology indication, and received ≥1 doses of IV morphine for the treatment of rigors at Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist between July 2016 and July 2019

Exclusion Criteria

Receiving treatment with a medication other than morphine for the initial rigor event, having rigors after receiving a medication other than rituximab or ATG, already meeting the inclusion criteria for a previous episode of rigors, and receiving morphine for an indication other than rigors within the past 12 hours

Methods

Patients received 2 mg of IV morphine at the onset of rigors, followed by another 2 mg if no response within 15 minutes. Escalation to 12.5 mg or 25 mg of IV meperidine was at the provider's discretion. Data were collected from electronic medical records.

Duration July 2016 to July 2019
Outcome Measures

Primary: Stopping of rigors after administration of IV morphine without escalation to meperidine within 60 minutes

Secondary: Dose of morphine required to stop rigors, time to resolution of rigors

Baseline Characteristics Characteristic

Overall population (N= 57)

Patients receiving rituximab (n= 34) Patients receiving ATG (n= 23)
Male sex, n (%) 29 (50.8) 20 (58.8) 9 (39.1)
Age group, n (%) - 18-39 y 4 (7) 2 (5.9) 2 (8.7)
Age group, n (%) - 40-59 y 15 (26.3) 8 (23.5) 7 (30.4)
Age group, n (%) - 60-79 y 33 (57.9) 19 (55.9) 14 (60.9)
Age group, n (%) - ≥80 y 5 (8.8) 5 (14.7) 0 (0)
Indication, n (%) - Graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis 23 (40.3) 0 (0) 23 (100)
Indication, n (%) - Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma 15 (26.3) 15 (44.1) 0 (0)
Indication, n (%) - Chronic lymphocytic leukemia 4 (7) 4 (11.8) 0 (0)
Indication, n (%) - Follicular lymphoma 3 (5.3) 3 (8.8) 0 (0)
Indication, n (%) - Other 12 (21.1) 12 (35.3) 0 (0)
Results Patient population

Stdy patients (N= 57)

Stopped rigors with IV morphine 55 (96)
Resolution with 1 dose of IV morphine (2 mg total) 39 (71)
Resolution with 2 doses of IV morphine (4 mg total) 16 (29)
Rituximab n=34
Stopped rigors with IV morphine 33 (97)
Resolution with 1 dose of IV morphine (2 mg total) 27 (82)
Resolution with 2 doses of IV morphine (4 mg total) 6 (18)
Antithymocyte globulin n=23
Stopped rigors with IV morphine 22 (96)
Resolution with 1 dose of IV morphine (2 mg total) 12 (55)
Resolution with 2 doses of IV morphine (4 mg total) 10 (45)
Adverse Events

Fatigue in 2 patients after receiving IV morphine. No adverse events reported with meperidine

Study Author Conclusions

Morphine is a safe and appropriate alternative to meperidine for the treatment of rituximab- or ATG-related rigors that can be easily accessed in an infusion suite or an inpatient unit. Future studies are needed to assess the benefit of using morphine for the treatment of rigors that are induced by the use of other oncology medications.

Critique

There was a lack of statistical analysis to determine the magnitude effect of findings. Additionally, the inability to accurately assess the time to resolution of rigors due to lack of standardized documentation is a limitation. Further prospective studies with standardized monitoring could provide more definitive conclusions.

References:

Treatment with morphine to stop rigors associated with rituximab and antithymocyte globulin. Published online August 2, 2024. Accessed April 1, 2025. https://jhoponline.com/online-first/treatment-with-morphine-to-stop-rigors-associated-with-rituximab-and-antithymocyte-globulin

A Comparison Between Meperidine, Clonidine and Urapidil in the Treatment of Postanesthetic Shivering
Design

Randomized, double-blinded study

N= 60

Objective To compare the effects of meperidine, clonidine, and urapidil on postanesthetic shivering
Study Groups

Meperidine (n= 20)

Clonidine (n= 20)

Urapidil (n= 20)

Inclusion Criteria Patients shivering during recovery from general anesthesia, ASA physical status I and II, without cardiovascular diseases and without diseases impairing thermoregulation
Exclusion Criteria Not specified
Methods

Patients were treated with 25 mg meperidine IV, 0.15 mg clonidine IV, or 25 mg urapidil IV. If shivering did not stop within 5 min, the treatment was repeated once; clonidine was replaced with saline for the second dose. Rectal temperature, arterial blood pressure, heart rate, Sao2, and vigilance were monitored.

Duration Not specified
Outcome Measures Primary: Effectiveness in stopping postanesthetic shivering Secondary: Changes in mean arterial pressure and Sao2
Baseline Characteristics Characteristic Urapidil (n= 20) Clonidine (n= 20) Meperidine (n= 20)
Sex, M:F 13:7 12:8 13:7
Age, years 31.6 ± 11.7 33.9 ± 11.2 42.1 ± 15.5
Body weight, kg 69.5 ± 13.2 76.5 ± 14.4 75.5 ± 14.4
Duration of anesthesia, min 108.3 ± 37.5 122.7 ± 41.0 108.4 ± 56.1
Rectal temperature at time of arrival at the recovery room, °C 36.3 ± 0.6 36.2 ± 0.7 36.0 ± 0.5
Rectal temperature at time of discharge, °C 36.6 ± 0.6 36.6 ± 0.8 36.3 ± 0.6

Degree of shivering before treatment

Mild

Modest

Severe

 

4

11

5

 

7

9

4

 

4

13

3

Results Treatment Shivering stopped after single dose Shivering stopped after both doses Shivering did not stop after both doses
Urapidil 6 12 8
Clonidine 16 20 0
Meperidine 18 20 0
Adverse Events

Mean arterial pressure decreased in the Urapidil and Clonidine groups but not significantly in the Meperidine group. Sao2 decreased slightly in the Clonidine and Meperidine groups. Two patients experienced postoperative nausea and vomiting after meperidine treatment

Study Author Conclusions

Both meperidine and clonidine were nearly 100% effective in stopping postanesthetic shivering without negative side effects. Urapidil was less effective and cannot be recommended over clonidine and meperidine as a standard treatment.

Critique

The study was well-designed with a randomized, double-blinded approach, providing strong evidence for the effectiveness of meperidine and clonidine. However, the study's exclusion criteria were not specified, and the sample size was relatively small, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, the study did not specify the duration of follow-up, which could be important for assessing long-term effects.

 

References:

Schwarzkopf KRG, Hoff H, Hartmann M, Fritz HG. A comparison between meperidine, clonidine and urapidil in the treatment of postanesthetic shivering. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2001;92(1):257-260.

Comparison of meperidine, tramadol and fentanyl for post-spinal shivering prevention during cesarean delivery: A double-blind randomized controlled trial
Design

Double-blind randomized controlled trial

N= 350

Objective To assess the effects of intravenously administered meperidine, fentanyl and tramadol in reducing the incidence, onset time and severity of the shivering response in parturients during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia
Study Groups

Normal saline (control) (n= 50)

Low-dose meperidine (n= 50)

High-dose meperidine (n= 50)

Low-dose fentanyl (n= 50)

High-dose fentanyl (n= 50)

Low-dose tramadol (n= 50)

High-dose tramadol (n= 50)

Inclusion Criteria Parturients (ASA physical status I or II), between 20 and 40 years of age, undergoing emergency or elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia
Exclusion Criteria Parturients presenting with shivering before delivery, temperatures greater than 38°C or less than 36°C, and those with contraindications to spinal anesthesia and narcotics
Methods

Parturients were randomly allocated to seven study groups and received either normal saline, low-dose or high-dose meperidine, fentanyl, or tramadol. Shivering incidence, onset time, severity, patient satisfaction, and sedation scores were measured. Shivering was graded using a 4-point scale and sedation using the Ramsey sedation scale.

Duration Not specified
Outcome Measures

Primary: Incidence, onset time, and severity of shivering

Secondary: Patient satisfaction and sedation scores

Baseline Characteristics Characteristic Normal saline (n= 50) Fentanyl low dose (n= 50) Fentanyl high dose (n= 50) Meperidine low dose (n= 50) Meperidine high dose (n= 50) Tramadol low dose (n= 50) Tramadol high dose (n= 50)
Age, years (mean ± SD) 23.7 ± 1.2 23.5 ± 1.7 24.1 ± 1.2 23.7 ± 1.4 23.8 ± 1.6 24 ± 2.8 24 ± 1.5
Weight, kg (mean ± SD) 66.6 ± 8.2 66.5 ± 8.3 67.2 ± 8.0 67.8 ± 8.0 67.8 ± 8.7 66.3 ± 8.3 65.4 ± 7.5
Baseline temperature, °C (mean ± SD) 36.8 ± 0.2 36.8 ± 0.1 36.8 ± 0.1 36.8 ± 0.1 36.8 ± 0.1 36.8 ± 0.1 36.8 ± 0.2
Results Endpoint Normal saline (n= 50) Fentanyl low dose (n= 50) Fentanyl high dose (n= 50) Meperidine low dose (n= 50) Meperidine high dose (n= 50) Tramadol low dose (n= 50) Tramadol high dose (n= 50) p-Value
Shivering onset (min) 5.5 ± 1.8 13.2 ± 4.5 16.7 ± 5.5 27.5 ± 6.3 33.5 ± 3.8 21.6 ± 6.6 27.8 ± 8.7 <0.01
Grades of shivering (1/2/3) 1/12/21 6/10/5 1/14/4 1/5/2 0/4/0 1/7/3 1/8/0 0.002
Nausea/vomiting (No.) 3 7 9 7 8 8 17 0.029

Grade of sedation at 60 min

Grade 2

Grade 3

Grade 4

 

40 (80%)

7 (14%)

3 (6%)

 

15 (30%)

18 (36%)

17 (34%)

 

10 (21%)

22 (44%)

18 (36%)

 

19 (38%)

16 (32%)

15 (30%)

 

5 (10%)

27 (54%)

18 (36%)

 

38 (76%)

8 (17%)

4 (8%)

 

32 (64%)

11 (24%)

7 (14%)

< 0.001
Adverse Events Nausea and vomiting were reported in approximately 15% of all experimental groups, with a significantly higher occurrence in the high-dose tramadol group (17/50, p< 0.05)
Study Author Conclusions Intravenously administered meperidine, fentanyl and tramadol reduce shivering incidence, onset time and severity in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery following spinal anesthesia. Low-dose intravenous tramadol (0.5 mg/kg) allowed shivering prevention and low sedation scores, offering greater parturient satisfaction and better maternal–newborn bonding
Critique The study was well-designed as a double-blind randomized controlled trial, providing robust evidence for the efficacy of the drugs tested. However, the study's generalizability may be limited due to its single-region sample in Pondicherry, India. Additionally, the study did not consider the role of adjunctive ondansetron in reducing tramadol-induced nausea and vomiting or compare the anti-shivering properties of intrathecal fentanyl, which could have provided more comprehensive insights.

 

References:

Jayaraj A, Balachander H, Kuppusamy SK, Arusamy S, Rai Y, Siddiqui N. Comparison of meperidine, tramadol and fentanyl for post-spinal shivering prevention during cesarean delivery: A double-blind randomized controlled trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019;45(11):2202-2208. doi:10.1111/jog.14106